Global warming is not just a matter of scientific debate. When this issue was described in the mainstream media and the controversy raised, local politicians automatically started to look at it. Yet what they were really interested in was not discussing this problem. What they really wanted was to control what the scientist say. it They wanted censorship. Let's see how it was made.
Many scientists argue that they face enormous pressure not to disclose all the scientific evidence, saying that climate change was the result of human activity. Nearly half of U.S. researchers said they personally experienced combined pressure of adapting the results of studies to meet official Bush's administration scepticism. They were ordered not to discuss global warming and other related topics in public debates. They were made to remove the word as "global warming" or "climate change" from numerous documents released to the public information. U.S. government officials have edited news of their scientists discoveries before release anything to the public. Lobbyists for the oil industry have an important role in this process. To protect Bush from controversy before the presidential election in 2004, NASA employees also censored scientific reports on global warming.
Not only politicians have tried to suppress information on climate change, but even some of citizens. Some of more famous scientists had received threatening emails and death of animals dropped in their immediate vicinity. One of the site racist www pages posted pictures of these scientists and added inscription "Jew" next to each of them. This problem raised so serious that one of the main global warming scientists said he always travels with bodyguards.
There is yet another site of that phenomena, and it seems that process works on both sides. Journalists working for mainstream media need something sensational, something strong that will shake people and attract their attention. They want to write about climate change as about something "catastrophic", that is taking us to "the point of no return". If someone express the view of moderate sceptic, he may also receive strong criticism or ostracism. Media seem to use more and pejorative adjectives such as "catastrophic", "terrible" and "irrevocable" in any piece of information about global warming. It looks journalist wants to do more dramatic show than really takes place.
It seems that there are two opposite groups of interest - a State (the oil industry people) and other related to media. Fist group is to try to censor any information saying that global warming is caused by human activities (like polluting environment by burning fossil fuels). Another attempt to exaggerate the threat, pump it and make it even more dramatic than it really is, no matter what the actual studies say. Our challenge is to stay with the common sense and use our own judgments about how much climate change is actually a serious problem.
Jack Jackson promotes knowledge about alternative energy sources. Click here to learn how to build your own Free Energy Generator.
Our website is not responsible for the information contained by this article. Webworldarticles.com is a free articles resource thus practically any visitor can submit an article. However if you notice any copyrighted material, please contact us and we will remove the article(s) in discussion right away.
This article was sent to us by:
Unknown at
08242010
1. Losing Data from a Digital Camera
All articles in this directory are property of their respective authors. Additionally, read our Privacy Policy
© 2010 WebWorldarticles.com - All Rights Reserved. Partners: Gunblade Saga